Techdirt: AT&T-Funded Politicians Accuse Google Of Gaming The Spectrum Auction SystemAmazing. We've got three Representatives of Congress currently going after Google (with allegations of wrongdoing) for their outright
insolence at trying to intrude upon AT&T's turf, and nobody can figure out why all of a sudden these three particular politicians have banded together in AT&T's "defense"...
Well, it's got to be for the common good, right? That's what Congresspeople do, you know, fight for the little guy, right the wrongs...
What's that? Follow the money? Okay, well let's see who the top "campaign contributers" for
Fred Upton,
Cliff Stearns and
John Shimkus have been...
Oh. Well, that explains that, doesn't it?
You know, the thing is, I know this is how Washington DC works. Everyone does. You give money to people with the power to make and enact laws, and you get favors in return. It's the way things have always been. I don't think it's going to change anytime soon.
That being said, if things were just more open—if I didn't have to search for this information every time a politician did something shady—I wouldn't have so much of a problem with it! I mean, it'd be easy -- right there on CNN or C-SPAN, underneath the politician's name where they usually have their party affiliation and state (for example, "R-Tennessee"), they could have their corporate affiliation, as well (for example, "R-Tennessee-Citgo_Boeing_Honeywell").
Not only would it be easier to document, but it'd be easier to predict the way that votes are going to go, too! Think about it: when a particular vote is coming up before Congress (say, a vote banning government subsidies for telecommunication companies or something), you could simply do an index search of Congress' roster for a string like "AT&T|Verizon|Comcast", and if the amount of results that come back equal 50% or more of the total voting group, you could be sure that the vote was going to pass.
Hell, in the interest of further optimization, you could simply get rid of the voting entirely! Just have "virtual" votes where a computer would instantly tally the information, and then if the bill is passed, it could go onto a "virtual executive signature compiler," where, depending upon the current President's corporate affiliation, a "virtual signature" could be either appended to the bill, or a "virtual veto" appended.
Then, if the initial tally was 66% or more, a "virtual overturn" could even occur!
Hell, I just did away with two whole operating branches of the government here, potentially saving the taxpayers untold
billions of dollars, which—and I don't think I'm alone in this—these companies definitely deserve back in the form of subsidies, because of all the work they've done in providing the framework.
Yes, I'm totally serious about all of this.